Pipe with water
Experimentation with and knowledge regarding water-pipe tobacco smoking among medical students at a major university in Brazil * , **
Stella Regina Martins
Renato Batista Paceli
Marco Antônio Bussacos
Frederico Leon Arrabal Fernandes
Gustavo Faibischew Prado
Elisa Maria Siqueira Lombardi
Ubiratan Paula Santos
1 Attending Physician. Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute, University of São Paulo School of Medicine Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, Brazil
2 Doctoral Student. Department of Pulmonology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
3 Statistician. Fundação Jorge Duprat Figueiredo de Segurança e Medicina do Trabalho – FUNDACENTRO, Jorge Duprat Figueiredo Foundation for Occupational Safety and Medicine – São Paulo, Brazil
4 Attending Physician. Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute, University of São Paulo School of Medicine Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, Brazil
5 Attending Physician. Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute, University of São Paulo School of Medicine Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, Brazil
6 Attending Physician. Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute, University of São Paulo School of Medicine Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, Brazil
7 Associate Professor. University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
8 Attending Physician. Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute, University of São Paulo School of Medicine Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, Brazil
Water-pipe tobacco smoking is becoming increasingly more common among young people. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of the use of water pipes and other forms of tobacco use, including cigarette smoking, among medical students, as well as to examine the attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge of those students regarding this issue.
We administered a questionnaire to students enrolled in the University of São Paulo School of Medicine, in São Paulo, Brazil. The respondents were evaluated in their third and sixth years of medical school, between 2008 and 2013. Comparisons were drawn between the two years.
We evaluated 586 completed questionnaires. Overall, the prevalence of current cigarette smokers was low, with a decline among males (9.78% vs. 5.26%) and an increase among females (1.43% vs. 2.65%) in the 3rd and 6th year, respectively. All respondents believed that health professionals should advise patients to quit smoking. However, few of the medical students who smoked received physician advice to quit. Experimentation with other forms of tobacco use was more common among males (p ( 1 ) In addition to that false sense of safety, reasons for the worldwide spread of the use of water pipes might include increased awareness of the negative health effects of cigarette smoking and the pleasing social interaction that comes with water-pipe tobacco smoking sessions. However, water-pipe tobacco smokers usually share the same mouthpiece (passing it from person to person), which can facilitate the spread communicable diseases, such as colds, respiratory infections, tuberculosis, hepatitis, and herpes. There have been reports of drug-resistant tuberculosis being transmitted via water-pipe tobacco smoking. ( 2 – 5 )
Because of the quick-light charcoal used in water-pipe tobacco smoking, the average carbon monoxide-nicotine ratio in water-pipe smoke is 50:1, compared with 16:1 in cigarette smoke. ( 6 ) Among water-pipe tobacco smokers, there have been reports of carbon monoxide poisoning, manifesting as headache, dizziness, nausea, and weakness, followed by syncope. ( 7 ) The truth is that water-pipe smokers are exposed to many hazardous substances. In 2010, Akl et al. ( 8 ) conducted a systematic review of 24 studies of the health effects of water-pipe tobacco smoking. The authors found that water-pipe tobacco smoking was significantly associated with lung cancer (OR = 2.12; 95% CI: 1.32-3.42) and respiratory illness (OR = 2.3; 95% CI: 1.1-5.1).
One critical point is that the smoking control community will need to counter the current erroneous argument that water-pipe tobacco smoking has fewer ill effects on human health than does cigarette smoking. In 2009, the state of São Paulo, Brazil, enacted Law no. 13779, which prohibited the sale of water pipes to minors (individuals ( 9 ) Nevertheless, there is a need for additional public health campaigns advising water-pipe tobacco smokers of the health risks to which they are exposing themselves.
As aspiring physicians, medical students might eventually play an important role in shaping smoking control policies. Therefore, it is important that such students are aware of the myths and realities regarding the use of the water pipes. However, there have been few studies of the prevalence of water-pipe tobacco smoking among medical students. In addition, there are few data related to the knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes of such students regarding this subject.
The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of experimentation with water-pipe tobacco smoking, as well as with other forms of tobacco use, including cigarette smoking, cigar/cheroot smoking, pipe smoking, and the use of smokeless tobacco products (chewing tobacco and snuff), among third- and sixth-year medical students. An additional objective was to evaluate attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge of those students regarding the various forms of tobacco use.
Medical students at the Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP, University of São Paulo School of Medicine) were asked to complete a structured questionnaire regarding their smoking habits. The questionnaire was composed of questions from the Global Health Professions Student Survey ( 10 ) and additional modules. The respondents were third- and sixth-year students who were present during regular medical school classes. The questionnaire was administered to students in the second semester of their third year and to the same class of students in the second semester of their sixth year. Three classes of students were evaluated: those in their third year in 2008 and in their sixth year in 2011; those in their third year in 2009 and in their sixth year in 2012; and those in their third year in 2010 and in their sixth year in 2013. The questionnaire was completed on a voluntary basis, and all participating students gave written informed consent. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the FMUSP Hospital das Clínicas.
Water-pipe tobacco smoking and other forms of tobacco smoking were defined as ever having taken at least a few puffs. Students who had smoked 100 or more cigarettes in their lifetime and were currently smoking were classified as cigarette smokers. Chart 1 shows the questionnaire used in the present study.
Chart 1 Questionnaire used in the study
Descriptive statistics were calculated. We used Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for statistical analyses comparing the proportions of positive responses between the two medical school years. Values of p Table 1 Prevalence of the various forms of tobacco use among medical students in their third year (in 2008, 2009, or 2010) and sixth year (in 2011, 2012, or 2013), by gender.a
|Form of tobacco use||Third-year medical students||p*||Sixth-year medical students||p*|
|n = 146||n = 189||n = 114||n = 137|
|n/N (%)||n/N (%)||n/N (%)||n/N (%)|
|Cigarette smoking b||2/140 (1.4)||18/184 (9.8)||c together with tobacco chewing or snuff dipping||16/146 (11.0)||56/189 (30.0)||c||58/146 (40.0)||101/189 (53.4)||n/N : positive responses/total respondents|
According to their responses on the questionnaire, all of the students who were cigarette smokers in their third or sixth year of medical school believed that health professionals should advise their patients who smoke to quit smoking. Table 2 shows that the majority of the respondents believe that the likelihood of smokers quitting increases if they are advised to do so by health professionals. However, most of aspiring physicians who were cigarette smokers were not advised to quit by a health professional: 15 (79%) of the 19 smokers evaluated in their third year; and 8 (89%) of the 9 smokers evaluated in their sixth year.
Table 2 Attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge regarding cigarette smoking held by medical students in their third year (in 2008, 2009, or 2010) and sixth year (in 2011, 2012, or 2013), by cigarette smoking status.a
|Question||Third-year medical students||p*||Sixth-year medical students||p*|
|Smokers b||Nonsmokers||Smokers b||Nonsmokers|
|n = 20||n = 324||n = 10||n = 237|
|n/N (%)||n/N (%)||n/N (%)||n/N (%)|
|Should health professionals routinely advise their smoking patients to quit?||20/20 (100)||292/304 (96.0)||ns||10/10 (100)||234/237 (99.0)||ns|
|Does the likelihood that smokers will quit increase if a health professional advises them to do so?||18/20 (90.0)||273/300 (91.0)||ns||10/10 (100)||222/236 (94.0)||ns|
|Are health professionals who smoke cigarettes less likely to advise their cigarette-smoking patients to quit?||6/20 (30.0)||194/301 (64.4)||n/N : positive responses/total respondents|
Health care professionals who smoke cigarettes are less likely to advise their cigarette-smoking patients to quit-that was the belief of 64.5% and 71.6% of the non-cigarette smoking medical students in their third and sixth years, respectively. However, among the smoking students, the proportion of who believed that health professionals who smoke cigarettes are less likely to advise their cigarette-smoking patients to quit increased from 30% in the third year to 50% in the sixth year (Table 2).
Table 3 shows that only a minority of the respondents believed that cigar, pipe, and cheroot smoking is less harmful because smokers puff less or do not inhale. Among the third-year students evaluated, the erroneous belief that cigar and pipe smoking is less harmful because the tobacco involved has lower concentrations of additives was held by 8.33% and 19.01% of the ever-users and never-users of tobacco products other than cigarettes and water-pipe tobacco (p Table 3 Comparison between ever-users or never-users of tobacco products other than cigarettes and water-pipe tobacco, in terms of their attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge regarding such products, among medical students in their third year (in 2008, 2009, or 2010) and sixth year (in 2011, 2012, or 2013).a
|Question||Third-year medical students||p*||Sixth-year medical students||p*|
|Ever-user b||Never-user||Ever-user b||Never-user|
|n = 72||n = 263||n = 59||n = 193|
|n/N (%)||n/N (%)||n/N (%)||n/N (%)|
|Is smoking a pipe, cigar, or cheroot less harmful, because people puff less or don’t inhale?||6/72 (8.3)||20/263 (7.6)||ns||3/57 (5.2)||6/191 (3.1)||ns|
|Is cigar or pipe smoke less harmful than cigarette smoke, because it has fewer additives?||6/72 (8.3)||50/263 (19.0)||n/N : positive responses/total respondents|
Table 4 shows that more than 80% of the aspiring physicians evaluated agreed that health professionals occupy a position of leadership and are role models for their patients, as well as for the general population. More than 98% of the respondents knew that impurities in water-pipe tobacco smoke are not filtered out through the water bowl.
Table 4 Comparison between ever-smokers or never-smokers of water-pipe tobacco, in terms of their attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge about water-pipe tobacco smoking, among medical students in their third year (in 2008, 2009, or 2010) and sixth year (in 2011, 2012, or 2013).a
|Question||Third-year medical students||p*||Sixth-year medical students||p*|
|Ever-smoker b||Never-smoker||Ever-smoker b||Never-smoker|
|n = 159||n = 176||n = 116||n = 135|
|n/N (%)||n/N (%)||n/N (%)||n/N (%)|
|Do health professionals serve as role models for their patients and the public?||131/158 (83.0)||148/176 (84.0)||ns||105/116 (90.5)||119/135 (88.1)||ns|
|Does water-pipe tobacco smoking have fewer harmful health effects, because impurities in the smoke are filtered out through the water bowl?||2/159 (1.2)||1/175 (0.5)||ns||0/113 (0)||3/131 (2.2)||ns|
n/N : positive responses/total respondents
In the present study, the proportions of self-described cigarette smokers among the respondents were lower than those reported for medical students at other universities in Brazil and abroad, as well as being lower than the current estimated prevalence in the general population of Brazil. ( 11 – 14 ) The National Survey of Health and Nutrition conducted in Brazil in 1989 among smokers > 15 years of age and the Telephone-based System for the Surveillance of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases in the population >18 years of age in 27 Brazilian cities showed that public policies for smoking control led to a drop in the prevalence of smokers from 34.8% in 1989 to 12.0% in 2012, corresponding to a 65.51% decrease. ( 13 , 15 ) It is noteworthy that, in the present study, most of the medical students who smoked reported that they were never advised to quit by a health professional. Medical schools have an ethical responsibility not only to educate but also to raise awareness of health hazards and provide treatment to protect the health of their students.
We found it surprising that, among the medical students evaluated here, experimentation with other forms of tobacco use, such as cigar, pipe, and cheroot smoking, was more common than was cigarette smoking. Experimentation with water-pipe tobacco smoking was critically high among the aspiring physicians at FMUSP, males and females alike. A review of studies on the prevalence of experimentation with water-pipe tobacco smoking among medical students showed that our result (47.0%) is similar to those reported for medical schools in England (51.7%), ( 16 ) Canada (40%), ( 17 ) and South Africa (43.5%), ( 18 ) whereas it is higher than that reported for a medical school in Turkey (28.6%). ( 19 )
Water-pipe tobacco smoking is the first new tobacco trend of the 21st century. ( 20 ) It is spreading around the world, having become as fashionable as cigars were in the last century, especially among young professionals and college students. ( 20 ) According to Morton et al. (2013), the self-reported prevalence of water-pipe tobacco smoking is highest among the male population of Vietnam (13.02%) and the female population of Russia (3.19%), whereas it remains low in Brazil (0.18% and 0.1% among men and women, respectively). ( 21 ) Another possible reason for the spread of water-pipe tobacco smoking is the success of programs to prevent initiation of the (cigarette) smoking habit and to encourage (cigarette) smoking cessation, in Brazil and worldwide. As a result of such anti-smoking campaigns, which target cigarette smokers, susceptible individuals have opted for or migrated to other forms of tobacco use, especially water-pipe smoking. ( 22 )
The way in which a water pipe is smoked is completely different from the way in which a cigarette is smoked. With a water pipe, smokers inhale combustion products from the charcoal used in heating the tobacco as well as the tobacco smoke itself; the smoke is cooled and appears smoother and easier to inhale because it passes through the water bowl. The way in which an individual smokes a water-pipe (frequency of puffing, depth of inhalation, and length of the smoking session) affects the concentrations of toxins absorbed by the smoker. For example, in a typical (one hour) water-pipe tobacco smoking session, a smoker can inhale 100-200 times the volume of smoke inhaled from a single cigarette. ( 1 )
Water pipes use a special type of tobacco that is moistened, and there are various flavors and aromas available, such as apple, mint, cherry, chocolate, coconut, licorice, cappuccino, and watermelon. ( 1 , 2 ) These chemical additives are used by tobacco manufacturers to alter the flavor, and some of them reduce the degree of throat irritation, making the tobacco smoke smoother. That has great appeal to that encourages experimentation by young people, the target population of tobacco industry marketing. ( 6 , 20 )
The Brazilian Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA, National Health Surveillance Agency) regulatory standard designated RDC No. 14 (established 15 March, 2012) bans the use of additives in all tobacco products marketed in Brazil after March 2014. This resolution is an important public health policy measure. By reducing the attractiveness of tobacco, the risk of smoking initiation by children and youths is expected to decrease. ( 23 ) However, the tobacco industry responded by claiming that 121 additives are essential to the manufacturing process. Consequently, ANVISA created an exception and exempted those additives for a period of 12 months. ( 24 ) During the same period, ANVISA enacted Ordinance No. 1980, which established a working group of experts on food additives, toxicology, pharmacy, cancer, and tobacco control, who were charged with analyzing all of the additives on the list. ( 25 )
Our finding that many smoking and nonsmoking medical students believe that health professionals who smoke cigarettes are less likely to advise their cigarette-smoking patients to quit is supported by the results of other studies. ( 26 , 27 ) In our sample, a minority of the ever-users of tobacco products other than cigarettes and water-pipe tobacco among the third-year students wrongly believed that tobacco products such as cigars, pipe tobacco, and cheroots have fewer additives and therefore are less harmful than are cigarettes. Only a few students mistakenly believed that the impurities of water-pipe tobacco smoke are filtered out through the water bowl. In the study conducted in Canada, ( 17 ) medical students (2.5% and 0.6% of the smokers and nonsmokers, respectively) were also found to hold erroneous beliefs, such as the belief that water-pipe tobacco smoke is less harmful than is cigarette smoke. In the study conducted in Turkey, ( 19 ) which evaluated medical and non-medical university students, the authors found that 65.2% of the smokers and 31.0% of the nonsmokers wrongly believed that water-pipe tobacco smoke is less addictive than is cigarette smoke. These populations are at risk because of a lack of knowledge. Therefore, this issue needs to be more widely discussed at universities and should be publicized through the dissemination of public policies on tobacco control.
We found it surprising that, although nearly all of the respondents in our study knew that water-pipe tobacco smoking is harmful, nearly half had experimented with it. The misconceptions that there is no harm in smoking a water pipe occasionally, that it is a safe form of tobacco use, and that the risk of dependence is low, are common among water-pipe tobacco smokers. However, there is now considerable evidence to the contrary. ( 28 ) A study conducted in Egypt showed that water-pipe tobacco smokers meet the same criteria for nicotine dependence as do cigarette smokers. ( 29 ) Another study employed a 10-item version of the Lebanon Waterpipe Dependence Scale to evaluate adult males who were water-pipe smokers in the United Kingdom. ( 30 ) The authors demonstrated that, among such smokers, the risk factors for water-pipe tobacco dependence included being of Arab ethnicity; having a low level of education; having been alone in the last session of smoking; the last session of smoking having been in the home, in a café, or with friends; smoking sessions being longer in duration; and smoking on a daily basis. The diagnostic criteria for nicotine dependence were met by 47% of sample studied by those authors. ( 30 )
In the present study, the form of tobacco use for which the prevalence was highest among the FMUSP medical students, regardless of class year and gender, was water-pipe tobacco smoking. However, the prevalence of cigarette smoking was below the national average. The second highest prevalence was found for the use of other tobacco products (smoked and smokeless, excluding cigarettes and water-pipe tobacco), the prevalence of which was higher among the male students than among the female students.
Almost all of our respondents believed that health professionals should advise their smoking patients to quit, and that the likelihood of smokers quitting increases if a health professional provides such advice. More than half of the nonsmoking respondents believed health professionals who smoke cigarettes are less likely to advise their cigarette-smoking patients to quit. Most of the medical students we evaluated were aware of the dangers of using smoked or smokeless tobacco products. They knew that pipes, cigars, and cheroots are no less harmful than are cigarettes because, contrary to popular belief, such products do not in fact have fewer additives and their users do not inhale less smoke. The medical students evaluated also believed that health professionals should routinely advise their patients to quit. In addition, the majority of the respondents believed that health professionals serve as role models, not only for their patients but also for the general population. A minority of the respondents believed that the impurities of water-pipe tobacco smoke are filtered out through the water bowl, which indicates that the majority had an accurate understanding of the harmfulness of water-pipe tobacco smoking. Despite that knowledge, water-pipe tobacco smoking was relatively popular among the FMUSP medical students evaluated.
The data gathered during this study indicate that medical school curricula should focus greater attention on the hazards of (even sporadic) water-pipe tobacco smoking, as well as taking a more effective approach to the myths and realities regarding this form of tobacco use, in order to prevent occasional smokers from becoming regular users. Such measures could be expected to effect a behavioral change among aspiring physicians, reflected in a decrease in the prevalence of water-pipe tobacco smoking. It is also expected that greater knowledge of the issue will make aspiring physicians more confident and motivated to provide routine guidance to their patients, with the objective of preventing all forms of tobacco use and promoting their cessation. Physicians armed with the requisite knowledge will play an important role in controlling the epidemic of water-pipe tobacco smoking.
1. World Health Organization [homepage on the Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization. [cited 2013 Sep 2]. Advisory Note–Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking: Health Effects, Research Needs and Recommended Actions by Regulators 2005. [Adobe Acrobat document, 12p.]. Available from:. http://www.who.int/tobacco/global_interaction/tobreg/Waterpiperecommendation_Final.pdf [ Links ]
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [homepage on the Internet]. Atlanta: CDC. [cited 2013 May 8]. Smoking & Tobacco Use – Hookahs. Available from:. http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/tobacco_industry/hookahs/ [ Links ]
3. Maziak W, Ward KD, Afifi Soweid RA, Eissenberg T. Tobacco smoking using a waterpipe: a re-emerging strain in a global epidemic. Tob Control. 2004;13(4):327-33. [ Links ]
4. Martin R, Safaee SD, Somsamouth K, Mounivong B, Sinclair R, Bansal S, et al. Mixed methods pilot study of sharing behaviors among waterpipe smokers of rural Lao PDR: implications for infectious disease transmission. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(6):2120-32. [ Links ]
5. Onofre D. Hookah smoking: a rising tuberculosis health risk factor.UTHEALTH Northeast [serial on the Internet]. [Adobe Acrobat document, 3p.] Available from: www.heartlandntbc.org/casestudies/cs10.pdf [ Links ]
6. Research for International Tobacco Control (RITC), editors. Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking — Building the Evidence Base. Part One: the Smoke Chemistry. Ottawa: IDRC/CRDI; 2006 [cited 2013 Sep 2]. [Adobe Acrobat document, 79p.]. Available from:. http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/45880/1/132376.pdf [ Links ]
7. La Fauci G, Weiser G, Steiner IP, Shavit I. Carbon monoxide poisoning in narghile (water pipe) tobacco smokers. CJEM. 2012;14(1):57-9. [ Links ]
8. Akl EA, Gaddam S, Gunukula SK, Honeine R, Jaoude PA, Irani J. The effects of waterpipe tobacco smoking on health outcomes: a systematic review. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(3):834-57. [ Links ]
9. Assembleia Legislativa do Estado de São Paulo [homepage on the Internet]. São Paulo: a Assembleia [cited 2013 Sep 2]. Lei No 13.779, de 21 de Outubro de 2009. Proíbe a venda de narguilé aos menores de 18 anos Available from:. http://www.al.sp.gov.br/repositorio/legislacao/lei/2009/lei-13779-21.10.2009.html [ Links ]
10. The Global Tobacco Surveillance System Collaborating Group. The global tobacco surveillance system (GTSS): purpose, production and potential. J Sch Health. 2005(1);75:15-24. PMid:15779140. 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.tb00004.x [ Links ]
11. Szklo AS, Sampaio MM, Martins LF, Fernandes EM. O tabagismo no contexto dos futuros profissionais de saúde do Rio de Janeiro. Rev Bras Cancerologia. 2011;57(3):321-7. [ Links ]
12. Almerie MQ, Matar HE, Salam M, Morad A, Abdulaal M, Koudsi A, et al. Cigarettes and waterpipe smoking among medical students in Syria: a cross-sectional study. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12(9):1085-91. [ Links ]
13. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde; Secretaria de Gestão Estratégica e Participativa. Vigitel Brasil 2012: vigilância de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas por inquérito telefônico. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2013. [ Links ]
14. Chkhaidze I, Maglakelidze N, Maglakelidze T, Khaltaev N. Prevalence of and factors influencing smoking among medical and non-medical students in Tbilisi, Georgia. J Bras Pneumol. 2013;39(5):579-84. [ Links ]
15. Monteiro CA, Cavalcante TM, Moura EC, Claro RM, Szwarcwald CL. Population-based evidence of a strong decline in the prevalence of smokers in Brazil (1989-2003) [Internet]. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(7):527-34. [ Links ]
16. Jawad M, Abass J, Hariri A, Rajasooriar KG, Salmasi H, Millett C, et al. Waterpipe smoking: prevalence and attitudes among medical students in London. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013;17(1):137-40. [ Links ]
17. Vanderhoek AJ, Hammal F, Chappell A, Wild TC, Raupach T, Finegan BA. Future physicians and tobacco: An online survey of the habits, beliefs and knowledge base of medical students at a Canadian university. Tob Induc Dis. 2013;11(1):9. [ Links ]
18. Senkubuge F, Ayo-Yusuf OA, Louwagie GM, Okuyemi KS. Water pipe and smokeless tobacco use among medical students in South Africa. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012;14(6):755-60. [ Links ]
19. Poyrazoglu S, Sarli S, Gencer Z, Günay O. Waterpipe (narghile) smoking among medical and non-medical university students in Turkey. Ups J Med Sci. 2010;115(3):210-6. [ Links ]
20. American Lung Association [homepage on the Internet]. Washington (DC): AMA. [cited 2013 Sep 1]. Tobacco Policy Trend Alert. An emerging deadly trend: waterpipe tobacco use; 2007. [Adobe Acrobat document, 9p.]. Available from:. http://www.lungusa2.org/embargo/slati/Trendalert_Waterpipes.pdf [ Links ]
21. Morton J, Song Y, Fouad H, Awa FE, Abou El Naga R, Zhao L, et al. Cross-country comparison of waterpipe use: nationally representative data from 13 low and middle-income countries from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS). Tob Control. 2013 Jun 11. [Epub ahead of print]. PMid:23760609. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050841 [ Links ]
22. Szklo AS, Sampaio MM, Fernandes EM, Almeida LM. Smoking of non-cigarette tobacco products by students in three Brazilian cities : should we be worried? [Article in Portuguese]. Cad Saude Publica. 2011;27(11):2271-5. [ Links ]
23. Tobacco Control Laws [homepage on the Internet]. Washington DC: Tobacco Control Laws [cited 2013 Sep 1]. Country details for Brazil–summary. Available from:. http://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/legislation/country/brazil/summary [ Links ]
24. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Instrução Normativa No 6, de 26 de Agosto de 2013. Regra atualizada sobre aditivo de tabaco. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília; 2013 Ago 27. [ Links ]
25. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Portaria No 1.980, de 24 de Dezembro de 2013. Diário Oficial da União; 26 Dez 2013; seção 2:18. [ Links ]
26. Cauchi D, Mamo J. Smoking health professional student: an attitudinal challenge for health promotion? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9(7):2550-61. [ Links ]
27. Guazzelli AC, Terra Filho M, Fiss E. Smoking among physicians in a specific region of the greater metropolitan area of São Paulo. J Bras Pneumol. 2005;(31)6:516-22. [ Links ]
28. Smith-Simone S, Maziak W, Ward KD, Eissenberg T. Waterpipe tobacco smoking: knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behavior in two U.S. samples. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008;10(2):393-8 [ Links ]
29. Auf RA, Radwan GN, Loffredo CA, El Setouhy M, Israel E, Mohamed MK. Assessment of tobacco dependence in waterpipe smokers in Egypt. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012;16(1):132-7 [ Links ]
30. Kassim S, Al-Bakri A, Al’absi M, Croucher R. Waterpipe tobacco dependence in u.k. Male adult residents: a cross-sectional study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014;16(3):316-25 [ Links ]
*Study carried out under the auspices of the Smoking Cessation Program, Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute, University of São Paulo School of Medicine Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, Brazil.
**A versão completa em português deste artigo está disponível em www.jornaldepneumologia.com.br
Received: December 09, 2013; Accepted: March 12, 2014
Correspondence to: Stella Regina Martins Avenida Dr. Éneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 44, 8º andar, bloco 2 CEP 05403-900, São Paulo, SP, Brasil Tel. 55 11 2661-5191. Fax: 55 11 2661-5695 E-mail: [email protected]
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
SCS Quadra 1, Bl. K salas 203/204
70398-900 – Brasília – DF – Brasil
Fone/Fax: 0800 61 6218 ramal 211
(55 61)3245-1030/6218 ramal 211
Pipe with water Experimentation with and knowledge regarding water-pipe tobacco smoking among medical students at a major university in Brazil * , ** Stella Regina Martins Renato Batista